會員中心 |  會員注冊  |  兼職信息發(fā)布    瀏覽手機版!    精選9.9元!    人工翻譯    英語IT服務(wù) 貧困兒童資助 | 留言板 | 設(shè)為首頁 | 加入收藏  繁體中文
當(dāng)前位置:首頁 > 外語學(xué)習(xí) > 英語學(xué)習(xí) > 英語語法學(xué)習(xí) > 正文

Larceny 和 Theft法律術(shù)語分析及英語解釋

發(fā)布時間: 2017-12-27 09:16:52   作者:etogether.net   來源: 網(wǎng)絡(luò)   瀏覽次數(shù):



[2]“The crime of obtaining title to another’s property by false pretense. ”Cf. Linda Picard Wood, J. D.,Merriam Websters Dictionary of Law, at p. 187, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated (1996).

[3] “Under tradition classification schemes, if only possession, rather than title, is obtained by trick, then the crime is not false pretenses by larceny. ”Cf. James E. Clapp, Random House Webster's Dictionary of the Law, at p. 178, Random House (2000).

[4] "The fraudulent taking of personal property with which one has been entrusted, esp. as a fiduciary. ” Cf. Biyan A. Gamer, Black's Law Dictionaryt 7th edition, at p. 540, West Group (1999 ).

[5]“The criminal intent for embezzlement unlike larceny and false pretense arises after taking possession (not before or during the taking. ) " Id. at p. 540.

[6] "Embezzlement is not a common-law crime. It is the result of legislative efforts to make provision for an unreasonable gap which appeared in the law of larceny as it developed. ” Cf. Rollin M. Perkins & Ronald N. Boyce, Criminal Law, 3rd edition, at p. 351 (1982).

[7]“To avoid this difficulty some states have employed another word to designate a statutory offense made up of a combination of larceny, embezzlement, and false pretense." Cf. Bryan A. Gamer, Black's Law Dictionary, 7th edition, at p. 1487, West Group (1999).

[8] "Common law distinctions between obtaining money under false pretense, embezzlement ,and larceny no longer exist in many states,all such crimes being embranced within general definition of larceny. ”Cf. The Publisher’s Editorial Staff, Black's Law Dictionary, abridged 6th edition, at p. 609, West Publishing Co. (1991).


微信公眾號

[上一頁][1] [2] 【歡迎大家踴躍評論】
我來說兩句
評分: 1分 2分 3分 4分 5分
評論內(nèi)容:
驗證碼:
【網(wǎng)友評論僅供其表達(dá)個人看法,并不表明本站同意其觀點或證實其描述?!?
評論列表
已有 0 條評論(查看更多評論)