Adjudicative fact和Legislative fact法律術(shù)語(yǔ)分析
2017-07-30 23:13:54 etogether.net 網(wǎng)絡(luò) 次
兩者之間的差別在于adjudicative fact (爭(zhēng)議事實(shí)，訴爭(zhēng)事實(shí)）是指訴訟，尤其是行政裁決程序中與當(dāng)事人具體相關(guān)的事實(shí)，如個(gè)人動(dòng)機(jī)、故意等，其為個(gè)案屬性[1]。
而legislative fact (立法事實(shí)）則泛指與案件具體當(dāng)事人的個(gè)人問題無關(guān)，即不屬于個(gè)案性質(zhì)而屬于法律規(guī)定的具有一般屬性的社會(huì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)、科 技等的事實(shí)問題，
其只在幫助法定或行政機(jī)關(guān)決定該立法的內(nèi)容及適用范疇[2]。
[1 ] “ Factual matters concerning the parties to an administrative proceeding as contrasted with legislative facts which are general and usually
do not touch individual questions of particular parties to a proceeding. ” Cf. The Publisher’s Editorial Staff, Black’s Law Dictionary (with
Pronunciations)，abridged 6th edition, at p. 26，West Publishing Co. (1991).
[2] “A fact that explains a particular law's rationaiity and that helps a court or agency determine the law's content and application. ” Cf.
Bryan A. Gamer, Black's Law Dictionary.
上一篇：admiralty court 和naval court法律術(shù)語(yǔ)分析
下一篇：Actual performance 和 Specific performance法律術(shù)語(yǔ)分析
微信公眾號(hào)搜索“譯員”關(guān)注我們，每天為您推送翻譯理論和技巧，外語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)及翻譯招聘信息。